<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mateo's musings &#187; XFCE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mateometzger.info/tag/xfce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mateometzger.info</link>
	<description>life, love, linux, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:34:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>To Prove My Point&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://mateometzger.info/2009/02/21/to-prove-my-point/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=to-prove-my-point</link>
		<comments>http://mateometzger.info/2009/02/21/to-prove-my-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crunchbang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Openbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu-based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VirtualBox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XFCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mateometzger.info/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In between writing a post on how ADD I am with desktop environments and the next post about being ADD with Linux distributions, I thought I&#8217;d mention that I just grabbed Crunchbang 8.10.02 and I&#8217;m about to give it a quick spin in VirtualBox.  Crunchbang is &#8220;an Ubuntu based distribution featuring the lightweight Openbox window [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In between writing a post on how ADD I am with desktop environments and the next post about being ADD with Linux distributions, I thought I&#8217;d mention that I just grabbed <a href="http://www.crunchbanglinux.org/wiki/downloads" target="_blank">Crunchbang 8.10.02</a> and I&#8217;m about to give it a quick spin in VirtualBox.  <a href="http://crunchbanglinux.org" target="_blank">Crunchbang</a> is &#8220;an Ubuntu based distribution featuring the lightweight Openbox window manager and GTK+ applications. The distribution is developed from a minimal Ubuntu install and has been designed to offer a good balance of speed and functionality.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m excited to check it out, and depending on what I think of Openbox, it may become my new recommendation for older computers (instead of <a href="http://xubuntu.org" target="_blank">Xubuntu</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mateometzger.info/2009/02/21/to-prove-my-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux ADD: Part 1</title>
		<link>http://mateometzger.info/2009/02/20/linux-add-part-1/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=linux-add-part-1</link>
		<comments>http://mateometzger.info/2009/02/20/linux-add-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gnome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XFCE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mateometzger.info/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post started off on a completely different topic, but it morphed into the following rant.  Look for a post about applying themes in Gnome in the near future. ================================== Those of you who know me as a tech/linux geek, know that I can&#8217;t stick with one distribution or desktop environment for too long (never [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post started off on a completely different topic, but it morphed into the following rant.  Look for a post about applying themes in Gnome in the near future.</p>
<p>==================================</p>
<p>Those of you who know me as a tech/linux geek, know that I can&#8217;t stick with one distribution or desktop environment for too long (never more than a month).  This has been my approach so far, but I see it as a way of spiraling around, hitting many facets of a Linux desktop, and slowly settling in on a configuration I feel works best for me.</p>
<p>As far as desktop environments go, I&#8217;ve always <em>wanted </em>to be a fan of <a title="kan you klick this k-link?" href="http://kde.org" target="_blank">KDE</a>, but they keep screwing it up for themselves.  I appreciate that they are trying hard to make Linux very graphically pleasing, but through versions 3.x it has come off as&#8230;. cartoony or something.  Certainly it was not very professional.  With the new 4.x series, they&#8217;ve jumped their game up to a whole new level.  The look and feel of KDE4 is starting to compete with <a title="zzzzzzzzzz....." href="http://microsoft.com/windows" target="_blank">Windoze</a> and <a title="mmmm... fruity" href="http://apple.com/macosx" target="_blank">Max</a>.  The problem I now have is the instability I&#8217;ve experienced with it.  Most recently, <a title="when will 4.2.1.1.1 come out?" href="http://www.kde.org/announcements/4.2/" target="_blank">KDE 4.2</a> kept crashing on me, and even specifying that the crash was KDE&#8217;s fault. (I also can&#8217;t stand that every KDE app starts with a &#8216;K&#8217;.  I know Gnome does it with a &#8216;g&#8217; but it&#8217;s somehow less bothersome to me)</p>
<p>This brings us to the good ole Linux standby, <a title="little guys in your garden" href="http://gnome.org" target="_blank">Gnome</a>.  It&#8217;s stable, it &#8216;just works&#8217; how you would expect, and it&#8217;s the default for many distributions.  The problem historically has been &#8230; well &#8230; it was kinda ugly.  Rather than taking big leaps in interface like KDE though, it has slowly but surely been working on it&#8217;s A-game (graphically and &#8220;user-interfacely&#8221; speaking).  Now it has gotten to a point that I don&#8217;t think anyone objectively comparing it to Windoze would say one is better than the other.  They are just&#8230; different.  (folks comparing it to Max may think Gnome is not quite as nice, which would be an accurate assesment).</p>
<p><a href="http://xfce.org" target="_blank">XFCE</a> is certainly the &#8220;third wheel&#8221; when it comes to desktop environments, but it seems to be gaining steam.  It especially helps that it loads very quickly on netbooks and older hardware.  The first time I tried Xubuntu, I was very impressed with how &#8216;snappy&#8217; my computer suddenly felt, and it still looked pretty good while doing it.  It still has several shortcomings it needs to figure out to be a contender with the Big Boys, but it has already found it&#8217;s place to shine (on the aforementioned netbooks and older computers).  I still actually like to have it on a computer as a secondary option.  It lets me have a different experience every now and then without having to reload the system with something new.</p>
<p>*edit*<br />
I was getting ridiculous amounts of spam comments on this particular post, and I was having to clear out the spam queue every day, so I turned off comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mateometzger.info/2009/02/20/linux-add-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
